A U.S. Customs and Border Protection technician monitors overseas parcels as they get scanned at a mail inspection facility in Chicago.
Charles Rex Arbogast/AP
Shein and Temu, the ultra-cheap, ultra-fast retail giants, could be facing a new reality under rules proposed by the White House on Friday.
These companies have become huge sellers of clothes and home goods shipped from China to the U.S. And both online retailers have been operating differently from most other big retailers, using a tax loophole that’s saved them millions of dollars on import fees.
Instead of bringing large shipments into U.S. warehouses in bulk, Shein and Temu ship small individual orders directly to American shoppers. That means those packages can legally skip import taxes because U.S. law exempts shipments under $800 from import tax.
The Biden administration moved Friday to close that loophole for products that face tariffs, including the majority of clothes and textiles shipped from China.
The volume of these direct-to-consumer shipments that use the import-tax loophole — called “de minimis” — has ballooned. Last year, more than 1 billion packages were shipped to the U.S. compared to 140 million a decade ago, according to White House officials. They did not name Shein and Temu directly, but the shipments from both have accounted for much of the increase.
The White House says this scale of products going through the loophole undercuts American workers, retailers and manufacturers, while also making it harder for government officials to ensure the contents are legal and follow all the health, safety, intellectual-property and consumer-protection rules.
Another problem is fentanyl. This week, 126 Democratic lawmakers called on President Biden to use executive authority and closethe import-tax exemption. They say the loophole allows foreign importers to not only evade tariffs, but also ship narcotics and drug-processing equipment without stricter customs inspections.
The White House has proposed rules to stop the exemption from applying to goods that face certain tariffs or trade enforcement actions. Another proposed rule would also demand more paperwork and data on each package seeking the exemption, including certificates of compliance submitted to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Both Shein and Temu said Friday that the import loophole was not central to their success.
With clothes and home décor that cost as little as $15 or even $5, Temu and Shein have lured American shoppers to become among the fastest-growing retailers in the U.S.
Their websites post tens of thousands new products every day; they typically don’t go into production until enough people click to buy. Most purchases ship straight from the manufacturer to the shopper’s doorstep.
“Our mission has been to offer consumers a wider selection of quality products at affordable prices,” a Temu spokesperson said in a statement. “We achieve this through an efficient business model that cuts out unnecessary middlemen, allowing us to pass savings directly to our customers. Temu’s growth does not depend on the de minimis policy.”
Temu’s operations are based in China, where it’s faced allegations of using forced labor. Shein is headquartered in Singapore; its executives had told NPR that some of the company’s manufacturers — numbering around 5,000 — are also based in Brazil and Turkey, even though most remain in China.
Shein’s executive chairman had previously spoken in support of a total reform for the de minimis rule, without advocating a specific approach.
“Shein makes import compliance a top priority,” a Shein spokesperson said in a statement. “Our success is anchored in our unique on-demand business model, which allows us to bring customers the styles they want, efficiently and at an affordable price.”
The timeline for the White House’s new proposed rules is unclear. The administration also called on Congress to do a comprehensive reform of the de minimis trade exemption, which lawmakers have long had in their sights.
The original purpose of the exemption was to protect individual shippers and small businesses, and many shipping companies have opposed changes to the import tax structure.
