Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University in New York told CNBC “Street Signs Asia” on Tuesday.
America’s “long and unproductive involvement” in Afghanistan has been a “black eye” for U.S. foreign policy, said Prasad, who was formerly head of the International Monetary Fund’s China division.
“This will certainly knock the U.S. down a peg or two in the eyes of the rest of the world, although it is far from clear that the outcome in Afghanistan will by itself … drive any country deeper into China’s economic and political embrace,” he said in a separate email.
Afghanistan fell to Taliban control when the Islamist militant group seized the capital of Kabul more than a week ago. The Taliban have made rapid advances across the country since the U.S. started withdrawing its military forces in Afghanistan ahead of its Aug. 31 deadline.
I think Beijing is likely to gloat in the short run — but who knows, it could have some problems on its hands in the long run.
PROFESSOR OF TRADE POLICY, CORNELL UNIVERSITY
Since then, chaos has erupted as tens of thousands — both foreigners and Afghans who collaborated with U.S. and Nato forces — try to flee the country. The Biden administration has been heavily criticized over its messy pullout from Afghanistan.
On top of that, the Islamic extremist militants now have access to billions of dollars worth of U.S.-supplied military equipment that Afghan forces surrendered to the Taliban.
A Taliban takeover could also come with its own problems for China, Prasad said.
There’s legitimate concern in Beijing about what a resurgence of the Taliban and other extremist groups might mean for China’s domestic stability as “it’s hard to imagine this won’t spill over the border in some fashion or the other,” he said.
The militant group has said it would not allow other terrorist organizations to use Afghanistan as a base to launch attacks. However, analysts have expressed doubts.
A United Nations report this year said the Taliban and al-Qaeda “remain closely aligned and show no indication of breaking ties.” The Taliban previously refuted those claims.
There are two possible scenarios with extreme possibilities, said Victor Gao, vice president of the Center for China and Globalization.
One is that the Taliban embraces reform and peace, and the other is that the Taliban reverts to its old ways — to what it was 20 years ago, Gao told CNBC Tuesday.
“That will constitute a lot of threat to the people in Afghanistan, but also to neighboring countries and regions like China’s Xinjiang region, for example, and put many people in harm’s way.”
Prasad added: “So I think Beijing is likely to gloat in the short run — but who knows, it could have some problems on its hands in the long run.”
Chinese media has cast the U.S. withdrawal in a negative light. Chinese state-run media Global Times published an editorial Monday blaming the defeat of the Afghan government on the withdrawal of U.S. forces.
‘Void’ left by U.S. withdrawal
The hasty U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan also raises some questions, Cornell’s Prasad pointed out.
“There are questions about whether — even if the U.S. is committed in the short run to a particular country or a particular region — whether the commitment can be sustained, or is credible over the longer term, and also whether the commitment might end in a very messy fashion, as we’re seeing right now,” he said.
U.S.′ Afghanistan move indicator of shift to ‘competition and conflict’ with China, says Avonhurst
Meanwhile, there are questions about who will fill the vacuum left by the “weak” American commitment in the region, Prasad said.
“The question is whether there is an alternative power that can, again, fill in the void that might be created by perceptions of weak American commitments or weak American ability to deliver on those commitments.”